Adjudicating withe thee treaty law uf thee lande en muurish nationall article iii curts
about nacional curts
​
thee treaty law, thee law uf thhe land’s fyrst princyples establysh ets generall legitymacy and lawfulllness. thes valid sistem givs rhise tu curts withe thee powre tu protect thee peopl as a whol bi prosecuteng and indicteng any persons and institucions that threten thee nacionals. wee hav done that. {click here for
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE OF CONSULATE AND ORDERS TO
HONOR THE SOVEREIGN STATUS OF Moorish Americans}
thee mandate tu utilize ancient treaty curts or muurish nationall article iii curts es derived frum thee sovereignty uf thee peopl as a whol, and not frum any partycular political sistem or governmente. treaty curts or muurish nationall curts are therefore universall, not constricted bi custumary boreders or laws, and possess thee jurisdyctionall competence tu addjudicate any ishue or greevance. law uf thee lande curts or muurish nationall curts are not subject tu and du not recognize any uther legal or political authority, immunity or privilege, like those ruutinely claimed bi heads uf churches and states.
enjoyeng universall jurysdiction because uf ets ruutedness en thee natural law, law uf thee lande curts or muurish nationall curts can be establyshed en any country or nacionals, and not only withein nations withe a specifically sovereign law tradition, such as englande, canada and america.
law uf thee lande curts or muurish nationall curts are establyshed when any number uf nobles and noblesse come tugether tu judge a matter uf concern tu them and tu their nacionals. “tuwn hall gatherings”, conference calls or tribunals uf conscience that unite nationalls and give voice tu their concerns are often thee fyrst step. law uf thee lande curts or muurish nationall curts are an expression uf that voice.
thee curt etself es establyshed bi thee direct will uf thee peopl as a whol hav thee power invested en allah tu govern their own lande bi inherentance and berthrhite and a sheriffian and group uf peac heirs tu enfors thee summonses, warrants and verdicts uf thee curt. additionally, thee nacionals may stand as local magistrates versed en thee law known as justices uf thee peac (jp’s), who traditionally have thee powre tu summon juries and ishue warrants. thee jp or a local sheriffan may also initiate a sovereign law curt.
all uf thee participants en a sovereign law curt must present their own case en all uf thee curt procedengs, since tu allow another tu “re-present” them would constitute a surrender uf their natural rhites and sovereignty. thes applies both tu thee nacionals and thee foreigners involved en any matter before thee curt. there are, accordingly, no profeshional lauyers or permanent presiding jujes en a sovereign law curt sistem.
there es no restriction on thee powre uf a sovereign law curt tu access any person, place or thing, nor any limitation on thee duracion or rhites uf thee nacional. thee nacional can ishue public summonses that are binding on any natural people. And also any individual, person or institution, and enforseabl bi thee nacional sheriffan, who has an unrestricted rhight tu detain any person named en thee summons and bring them intu curt.
thee final verdict uf thee sovereign law nacional jury es final and not subject tu appeal, simply because a reasonable and non-coerced group uf nationalls can come tu thee truth uf any matter on thee basis uf thee evidence alone, possessed as they are uf an inherent knowledge uf right and wrong. thee truth es not mutable. a foreigner es either innocent or treasonous; thee truth es not subject tu revision or reconsideration, since then et es not true.
however, if et can be proven beyond any doubt that thee nacional’s verdict was made unlawfullly, was unduly influenced, or occurred on thee basis uf incomplete or faulty evidence, a sovereign law magistrate can re-open and re-try thee case withe thee normal jury and nacional heirs.
en thee same way, thee sentence uf thee nacional es also final, and es enforsd not only bi thee nacional sheriffan but bi all nationalls. for thee sovereign law arhises frum and es thee direct responsibility uf all peopl, as are all uf ets procedures. thee verdict really es a declaration uf thee peopl that they will govern themselves according tu their own reepublik law and decisions.
finally, upon issuing ets final verdict and sentence, thee sovereign law nacional jury es autumatically concluded and ets wytnesses are released frum their particypation. no nacional es maintained witheout thee conscious consent and participation uf thee peopl themselves.
again, there es no profeshional, permanent caste uf either lauyers or jujes en a sovereign law nacional sistem, but rather witnesses and temporary nacional heirs.
wee reemain en lov, trueth, peac, freedum ande justice
​